Find clinical trials matched to your health profile
MatchVox analyzes your clinical information against trial requirements and produces a ranked shortlist with understandable reasons for every potential match.
Recruiting for a study? Explore MatchVox for institutions.
Two paths, one platform
Whether you're exploring treatment options or filling enrollment, start here.
Patients & caregivers
Discover potentially relevant trials and understand why each trial may or may not fit your health profile.
Share as much or as little of your health information as you like. Every ranked result comes with plain-language reasons, so you and your clinician can review the shortlist together.
Sponsors, CROs & research sites
Identify potential participants, reduce manual prescreening and give research teams reviewable eligibility evidence.
Run a focused recruitment pilot for one actively enrolling study — retrospective or de-identified data, criterion-level evidence for coordinator review, and measurable screening-time comparison. No production integration required for a first evaluation.
HOW IT WORKS
Three stages. Three seconds.
A two-stage retrieval-and-reranking architecture screens all 520,484 registered trials in about 3s per patient.
Input
Your health profile is parsed and understood in full clinical context — diagnoses, labs, medications, history.
Intelligence
Semantic retrieval + precision reranking scores every trial in the database against your specific profile.
Output
Ranked results with plain-language reasons for each — including what supports a match, what conflicts, and what is unknown.
The 5,418× figure compares our two-stage pipeline against exhaustively scoring every patient–trial pair with the cross-encoder — not against manual review or other products.
EVALUATION
The numbers, with their provenance
Every metric below names its dataset and label type. Internal metrics use silver labels; the external evaluation uses independent gold labels the model never saw. See our methodology and limitations.
Open Evaluation
Benchmark us yourself
Same patients. Same trials. Same criteria. We welcome head-to-head evaluations on shared datasets and will provide our evaluation harness so you can verify every number we publish.
Request a benchmarkResearch papers behind the methodology.
One published paper and four papers currently in submission. Every claim on this site traces to a documented evaluation.
View our researchof clinical trials fail to recruit on time
Every day without the right match is a day of treatment delayed.